CardiologyNowNews.org CardiologyNowNews.org
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
    • About
      • Message from the Editor-in-Chief
      • Mission Statement
      • Editorial Board
  • News
  • Topics
    • Acute Coronary Syndrome
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Cardiovascular Imaging
    • Cardiovascular Intervention
    • Cardiovascular Prevention
    • Cerebrovascular Disease
    • Heart Failure
    • Peripheral Vascular Disease
    • Structural Heart Disease
    • Valvular Heart Disease
  • Educational Resources
    • WikiDoc
    • BAIM Grand Rounds
    • Clinical Trial Results
  • ACC
    • ACC 2017
    • ACC 2018
    • ACC 2019
    • ACC 2020
    • ACC 2021
    • ACC 2022
    • ACC 2023
    • ACC 2024
    • ACC 2025
  • AHA
    • AHA 2017
    • AHA 2019
    • AHA 2021
    • AHA 2022
    • AHA 2023
    • AHA 2024
    • AHA 2025
  • ESC
    • ESC 2017
    • ESC 2018
    • ESC 2019
    • ESC 2021
    • ESC 2022
    • ESC 2023
    • ESC 2024
    • ESC 2025
  • SCAI
    • SCAI 2017
    • SCAI 2018
  • Videos
CardiologyNowNews.org CardiologyNowNews.org
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Home
    • About
  • News
  • Topics
    • Acute Coronary Syndrome
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Cardiovascular Imaging
    • Cardiovascular Intervention
    • Cardiovascular Prevention
    • Cerebrovascular Disease
    • Heart Failure
    • Peripheral Vascular Disease
    • Structural Heart Disease
    • Valvular Heart Disease
  • Educational Resources
    • WikiDoc
    • BAIM Grand Rounds
    • Clinical Trial Results
  • ACC
    • ACC 2017
    • ACC 2018
    • ACC 2019
    • ACC 2020
    • ACC 2021
    • ACC 2022
    • ACC 2023
    • ACC 2024
    • ACC 2025
  • AHA
    • AHA 2017
    • AHA 2019
    • AHA 2021
    • AHA 2022
    • AHA 2023
    • AHA 2024
    • AHA 2025
  • ESC
    • ESC 2017
    • ESC 2018
    • ESC 2019
    • ESC 2021
    • ESC 2022
    • ESC 2023
    • ESC 2024
    • ESC 2025
  • SCAI
    • SCAI 2017
    • SCAI 2018
  • Videos
Follow US
AHA 2024News

ARREST-AF: Aggressive Risk Factor Management After AF Ablation Reduces Arrythmia Recurrence at 12 Months

Leah Kosyakovsky
Share
3 Min Read

Key Points

  • Observation data has suggested that improving cardiometabolic risk factors after AF ablation may reduce the recurrence of arrythmias.
  • The ARREST-AF trial provides randomized controlled evidence demonstrating the benefits of a physician-led clinic focusing on risk factor modification (RFM) in reducing arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months.
  • Patients in the RFM group were significantly more likely to be free from recurrent arrhythmia and experienced improved AF symptom scores compared to those receiving usual care.
  • Improvements in body weight, systolic blood pressure, glycemic control, and exercise capacity were also observed in the RFM group, underscoring the role of risk factor control in mediating the observed benefits.

Prior observational studies have pointed to the role of aggressive risk factor modification (RFM) in improving long-term outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, randomized controlled trial data to validate this hypothesis has been lacking.

On November 18th  2024, the results of “Aggressive Risk factor REduction STudy for Atrial Fibrillation (ARREST-AF) implications for ablation outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial” were presented at AHA Scientific Sessions 2024. The purpose of this study was to determine if attempts at intensive RFM after AF ablation improves outcomes.

This randomized controlled trial included 122 consecutive Australian adult patients with paroxysmal or persistent symptomatic AF undergoing catheter ablation (pulmonary vein isolation with additional ablation at operator discretion) who had a body mass index of ≥ 27 kg/m2 and one additional cardiometabolic risk factor.  Patients with severe structural heart or systemic disease were excluded.  They were assigned in a 1:1 fashion at to RFM or usual care arm. Patients in the RFM arm received intensive risk factor management through a physician-led clinic, following AHA guideline-based recommendations. Patients in the usual care arm received standard, guideline-directed care for AF management. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients free from AF recurrence 12 months post-ablation. Secondary endpoints included changes in AF symptom severity, cardiometabolic risk factors, exercise capacity and need for redo ablation.

At 12 months, 66% of patients in the RFM group were free from AF recurrence at 12 months, compared to 42% in the usual care group, a significant difference (HR 2.18 [95% CI 1.25-3.70]; p=0.004).  In addition, AF symptom severity was significantly improved in the RFM group compared to the usual care group. The RFM group also had significantly improved body weight, glycemic control, and exercise capacity, indicating that the intervention was successful at achieving an improvement in control of major cardiometabolic risk factors.

Rajeev K. Pathak, MD, PhD, FACC, Director of Cardiac Electrophysiology at Canberra Heart Rhythm  in Garran, Australia, concluded: “Amongst patients with AF, elevated BMI and one additional cardiometabolic risk factor, aggressive risk factor management reduces arrhythmia recurrence in the 12-months following catheter ablation when compared with usual care.”

TAGGED:AHA 2024ConferenceFeaturedNews
Share This Article
Copy Link Print
CardiologyNowNews.org CardiologyNowNews.org
Copyright - CardiologyNowNews
  • Contact Us
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?