CardiologyNowNews.org CardiologyNowNews.org
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
    • About
      • Message from the Editor-in-Chief
      • Mission Statement
      • Editorial Board
  • News
  • Topics
    • Acute Coronary Syndrome
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Cardiovascular Imaging
    • Cardiovascular Intervention
    • Cardiovascular Prevention
    • Cerebrovascular Disease
    • Heart Failure
    • Peripheral Vascular Disease
    • Structural Heart Disease
    • Valvular Heart Disease
  • Educational Resources
    • WikiDoc
    • BAIM Grand Rounds
    • Clinical Trial Results
  • ACC
    • ACC 2017
    • ACC 2018
    • ACC 2019
    • ACC 2020
    • ACC 2021
    • ACC 2022
    • ACC 2023
    • ACC 2024
    • ACC 2025
  • AHA
    • AHA 2017
    • AHA 2019
    • AHA 2021
    • AHA 2022
    • AHA 2023
    • AHA 2024
    • AHA 2025
  • ESC
    • ESC 2017
    • ESC 2018
    • ESC 2019
    • ESC 2021
    • ESC 2022
    • ESC 2023
    • ESC 2024
    • ESC 2025
  • SCAI
    • SCAI 2017
    • SCAI 2018
  • Videos
CardiologyNowNews.org CardiologyNowNews.org
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Home
    • About
  • News
  • Topics
    • Acute Coronary Syndrome
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Cardiovascular Imaging
    • Cardiovascular Intervention
    • Cardiovascular Prevention
    • Cerebrovascular Disease
    • Heart Failure
    • Peripheral Vascular Disease
    • Structural Heart Disease
    • Valvular Heart Disease
  • Educational Resources
    • WikiDoc
    • BAIM Grand Rounds
    • Clinical Trial Results
  • ACC
    • ACC 2017
    • ACC 2018
    • ACC 2019
    • ACC 2020
    • ACC 2021
    • ACC 2022
    • ACC 2023
    • ACC 2024
    • ACC 2025
  • AHA
    • AHA 2017
    • AHA 2019
    • AHA 2021
    • AHA 2022
    • AHA 2023
    • AHA 2024
    • AHA 2025
  • ESC
    • ESC 2017
    • ESC 2018
    • ESC 2019
    • ESC 2021
    • ESC 2022
    • ESC 2023
    • ESC 2024
    • ESC 2025
  • SCAI
    • SCAI 2017
    • SCAI 2018
  • Videos
Follow US
ACC 2021Heart FailureInterventional CardiologyNews

Tricuspid Valve Replacement with the Transcatheter Evoque Valve is Safe and Effective at 30 days

Caroline Collis
Share
3 Min Read

Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement has become a feasible alternative to surgery in patients deemed to be at high risk of adverse events, and in the past decade, various devices have been designed to meet this clinical need. In his Focused Clinical Research session on the opening day of the American College of Cardiology 2021 Scientific Sessions, Dr. Susheel Kodali, director of the Structural Heart & Valve Center at New York-Presbyterian/ Columbia University Medical Center presented the 30-day results from the implantation of the EVOQUE valve, as part of the TRISCEND study.

The self-expanding, nitinol frame valve is implanted via a 28 French transfemoral venous delivery system and is designed to engage the leaflets and annulus to remain secure. In this single arm, prospective, multicenter study, patients with symptomatic, moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation were evaluated for implantation of the EVOQUE valve. At 30 days, the endpoints of interest were device and procedural success, reduction of TR, and a composite of major adverse events.

Of 56 enrolled patients, follow up data are available for 47. The mean age was 79, with severe TR and atrial fibrillation in greater than 90% of patents. Patients underwent device replacement for both functional and degenerative tricuspid regurgitation, and the procedure was a success in 98% of patients.

At 30 days, cardiovascular mortality occurred in one patient. Severe bleeding occurred in 22.6% of patients, and 2 patients had surgical reimplantation of their valve. Echocardiographic analysis at 30 days revealed reduction to none/trace or mild tricuspid regurgitation in 98% of patients. All patients achieved at least 1 grade reduction in their TR. There was a significant improvement in New York Heart Association class, 6-meter walk time, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score in patients at 30 days when compared to baseline.

After the presentation, Dr. Kodali admitted that the novelty of tricuspid valve interventions demands more understanding of the interaction between the tricuspid valve and the right ventricle. “One of the big challenges about this population is right ventricular dysfunction, and we struggle to understand whether the RV will tolerate the removal of this pop off valve,” he stated, alluding to the moderate and severe RV dysfunction seen immediately after valve implantation in 25% patients. These concerns mimic the early concerns of transcatheter mitral valve repair for severe mitral regurgitation, and Dr. Kodali is optimistic that ongoing trials, including the TRISCEND trial, will answer these questions.

TAGGED:FeaturedNews
Share This Article
Copy Link Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

CardiologyNowNews.org CardiologyNowNews.org
Copyright - CardiologyNowNews
  • Contact Us
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?