CardiologyNowNews.org CardiologyNowNews.org
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
    • About
      • Message from the Editor-in-Chief
      • Mission Statement
      • Editorial Board
  • News
  • Topics
    • Acute Coronary Syndrome
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Cardiovascular Imaging
    • Cardiovascular Intervention
    • Cardiovascular Prevention
    • Cerebrovascular Disease
    • Heart Failure
    • Peripheral Vascular Disease
    • Structural Heart Disease
    • Valvular Heart Disease
  • Educational Resources
    • WikiDoc
    • BAIM Grand Rounds
    • Clinical Trial Results
  • ACC
    • ACC 2017
    • ACC 2018
    • ACC 2019
    • ACC 2020
    • ACC 2021
    • ACC 2022
    • ACC 2023
    • ACC 2024
    • ACC 2025
  • AHA
    • AHA 2017
    • AHA 2019
    • AHA 2021
    • AHA 2022
    • AHA 2023
    • AHA 2024
    • AHA 2025
  • ESC
    • ESC 2017
    • ESC 2018
    • ESC 2019
    • ESC 2021
    • ESC 2022
    • ESC 2023
    • ESC 2024
    • ESC 2025
  • SCAI
    • SCAI 2017
    • SCAI 2018
  • Videos
CardiologyNowNews.org CardiologyNowNews.org
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Home
    • About
  • News
  • Topics
    • Acute Coronary Syndrome
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Cardiovascular Imaging
    • Cardiovascular Intervention
    • Cardiovascular Prevention
    • Cerebrovascular Disease
    • Heart Failure
    • Peripheral Vascular Disease
    • Structural Heart Disease
    • Valvular Heart Disease
  • Educational Resources
    • WikiDoc
    • BAIM Grand Rounds
    • Clinical Trial Results
  • ACC
    • ACC 2017
    • ACC 2018
    • ACC 2019
    • ACC 2020
    • ACC 2021
    • ACC 2022
    • ACC 2023
    • ACC 2024
    • ACC 2025
  • AHA
    • AHA 2017
    • AHA 2019
    • AHA 2021
    • AHA 2022
    • AHA 2023
    • AHA 2024
    • AHA 2025
  • ESC
    • ESC 2017
    • ESC 2018
    • ESC 2019
    • ESC 2021
    • ESC 2022
    • ESC 2023
    • ESC 2024
    • ESC 2025
  • SCAI
    • SCAI 2017
    • SCAI 2018
  • Videos
Follow US
Interventional CardiologyNewsStructural Heart DiseaseValvular Heart Disease

Gender Differences in Outcomes With TAVR

Sudarshana Datta
Share
4 Min Read

In a recent meta-analysis published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, it was found that postoperative complications of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) were different between males and females. While females were at increased risk of short-term complications (within 30 days) such as bleeding, stroke, and vascular complications, they had a lower incidence all-cause mortality within one year of the procedure.

Previously, observational studies have demonstrated that women undergoing TAVR are more likely to develop short-term complications such as major bleeding, transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke. However, the differences between males and females regarding the long-term outcomes was a matter of debate between the different experts. The principal investigator, Dr. Jinnette Abbott remarked, “Female sex has repeatedly been shown to be associated with in hospital TAVR complications such as bleeding and vascular complications but the long term results are favorable and the risk of mortality is lower compared to men.”

[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]“The study suggests that bleeding avoidance strategies need to be developed for women undergoing TAVR and surveillance for stroke risk factors needs to be increased post TAVR”-Dr. Jinnette Abbott[/perfectpullquote]

 

The meta-analysis pooled data from 17 studies that investigated the clinical outcomes of TAVR in both males and females. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at thirty days, one year and long term (>1year) follow up. Secondary outcomes such included MI, cardiovascular mortality, TIA and stroke at 30 days and at the longest follow-up duration available.

The investigators reported that at 30 days, gender had no impact on all-cause mortality; however, at 1 year and longer, female sex was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to men. Conversely, women were more likely to experience major bleeding, vascular complications, or require blood transfusion compared to men. In addition, females undergoing TAVR had increased risk of stroke/TIA and a numerical increase in the incidence of myocardial infarction.

The increased risk of short term complications in females was thought to be due to the older age of females undergoing TAVR in addition to their lower body surface area and smaller vessel diameter. The improved long term survival is attributed to the smaller annular size in females and thus decreased risk of developing postoperative aortic insufficiency (AI). Additionally, males included in the studies had more comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and decreased ejection fraction which may have impacted their survival.

In the publication, the authors note that “the current study, including 8 TAVR registries from multiple countries, is the largest analysis aiming to provide physicians and their patients with real-world data about sex-specific outcomes of TAVR at the longest follow-up available in the literature to date.” However, they also acknowledged that the inclusion of observational data from various registries and studies, the high heterogeneity in some outcomes and the absence of data at the patient-level may have been a deterrent to a more robust analysis.

When asked about the implications of this study on his clinical practice, Dr. Abbott said that “the study suggests that bleeding avoidance strategies need to be developed for women undergoing TAVR and surveillance for stroke risk factors needs to be increased post TAVR”

TAGGED:Featured
Share This Article
Copy Link Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

CardiologyNowNews.org CardiologyNowNews.org
Copyright - CardiologyNowNews
  • Contact Us
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?