CardiologyNowNews.org CardiologyNowNews.org
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
    • About
      • Message from the Editor-in-Chief
      • Mission Statement
      • Editorial Board
  • News
  • Topics
    • Acute Coronary Syndrome
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Cardiovascular Imaging
    • Cardiovascular Intervention
    • Cardiovascular Prevention
    • Cerebrovascular Disease
    • Heart Failure
    • Peripheral Vascular Disease
    • Structural Heart Disease
    • Valvular Heart Disease
  • Educational Resources
    • WikiDoc
    • BAIM Grand Rounds
    • Clinical Trial Results
  • ACC
    • ACC 2017
    • ACC 2018
    • ACC 2019
    • ACC 2020
    • ACC 2021
    • ACC 2022
    • ACC 2023
    • ACC 2024
    • ACC 2025
  • AHA
    • AHA 2017
    • AHA 2019
    • AHA 2021
    • AHA 2022
    • AHA 2023
    • AHA 2024
    • AHA 2025
  • ESC
    • ESC 2017
    • ESC 2018
    • ESC 2019
    • ESC 2021
    • ESC 2022
    • ESC 2023
    • ESC 2024
    • ESC 2025
  • SCAI
    • SCAI 2017
    • SCAI 2018
  • Videos
CardiologyNowNews.org CardiologyNowNews.org
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Home
    • About
  • News
  • Topics
    • Acute Coronary Syndrome
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Cardiovascular Imaging
    • Cardiovascular Intervention
    • Cardiovascular Prevention
    • Cerebrovascular Disease
    • Heart Failure
    • Peripheral Vascular Disease
    • Structural Heart Disease
    • Valvular Heart Disease
  • Educational Resources
    • WikiDoc
    • BAIM Grand Rounds
    • Clinical Trial Results
  • ACC
    • ACC 2017
    • ACC 2018
    • ACC 2019
    • ACC 2020
    • ACC 2021
    • ACC 2022
    • ACC 2023
    • ACC 2024
    • ACC 2025
  • AHA
    • AHA 2017
    • AHA 2019
    • AHA 2021
    • AHA 2022
    • AHA 2023
    • AHA 2024
    • AHA 2025
  • ESC
    • ESC 2017
    • ESC 2018
    • ESC 2019
    • ESC 2021
    • ESC 2022
    • ESC 2023
    • ESC 2024
    • ESC 2025
  • SCAI
    • SCAI 2017
    • SCAI 2018
  • Videos
Follow US
ACC 2026News

Transcutaneous Autonomic Neuromodulation Is Safe But Did Not Reduce BP in Uncontrolled Hypertension: SCRATCH-HTN

Nathan Kong MD
Share
4 Min Read

Key Points:

  • Approximately 40% of hypertensive patients fail to achieve recommended blood pressure (BP) targets despite antihypertensive medication treatments. Transcutaneous autonomic neuromodulation (tAN), a non-invasive, self-administered device-based approach, was evaluated as a potential adjunct to pharmacotherapy.
  • The SCRATCH-HTN trial enrolled 63 patients on an average of two antihypertensive medications who still had uncontrolled BP, randomized 2:1 to active tAN or sham treatment using the AffeX-CT device for 3 months.
  • While tAN was safe, well-tolerated, and demonstrated excellent adherence, it did not significantly reduce daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared to sham at 3 months.

Despite the availability of multiple effective antihypertensive drug classes, blood pressure (BP) control remains a persistent public health challenge, with approximately 40% of hypertensive patients failing to reach recommended targets. Currently available non-pharmacological interventions, such as renal denervation, are costly, invasive, and difficult to scale. Transcutaneous autonomic neuromodulation (tAN) – a non-invasive, self-administered approach that modulates autonomic tone via vagal sensory stimulation – has emerged as a potentially scalable adjunct.

The Sham-Controlled Randomized Control Trial evaluating the Safety, Acceptability and Efficacy of Autonomic Neuromodulation using TransCutaneous vagal sensory stimulation in uncontrolled Hypertensive patients (SCRATCH-HTN)  [NCT05179343 ] was a double-blind, sham-controlled, phase 2a trial. The study enrolled patients with uncontrolled hypertension (ambulatory daytime BP ≥135 / ≥85 mmhg with at least one antihypertensive agent). Participants were randomized 2:1 to active tAN or sham (inactive) treatment using the AffeX-CT device, which delivers sub-perception threshold electrical stimulation to the ear. The device was self-administered for a total of 3 months. Primary endpoints were safety and acceptability of the device and change in daytime ambulatory SBP

Sixty-three patients were randomized to tAN (n=41) or sham (n=22). The average age was 47.2 years, 71.4% were male, mean daytime BP was 150/95 mmHg, and median hypertension duration was 5 years. Adherence was excellent in both arms: the median proportion of days with self-administered therapy was 100% and median daily device use was 30 minutes in both groups. Over 3 months, daytime ambulatory SBP decreased by 3.15 mmHg in the tAN group and by 5.50 mmHg in the sham group which was not stiatistically significant in either unadjusted or adjusted analysis. No significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes including 24-hour ambulatory BP, office BP, BP variability, heart rate variability indices, sleep quality or 6-minute walk test distance. A prespecified subgroup analysis identified a significant interaction between treatment and baseline SBP: participants with a baseline SBP ≥160 mmHg demonstrated a meaningfully greater reduction in SBP with tAN compared to sham. No serious adverse device effects were reported in either arm.

Limitations of the trial include its modest sample size and pilot design, which was powered to detect efficacy signals rather than definitively establish treatment benefit. The larger-than-anticipated reduction in the sham arm further diminished statistical power. Additionally, antihypertensive medication changes occurred in a minority of participants, which may have introduced confounding.

Presenting at the American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions on March 28, 2026, lead investigator Dr. Ajay Gupta concluded that “tAN is safe, acceptable, and well-tolerated in hypertensive patients,” but that “there is no significant difference in BP reduction on tAN versus sham treatment in this cohort of uncontrolled hypertensive patients.” He noted that a potentially meaningful treatment effect may exist in patients with significantly elevated blood pressures (SBP ≥160 mmHg), and called for future phenotype-enriched trials, as well as objective markers to define likely responders.

TAGGED:ACC 2026ConferenceFeaturedNews
Share This Article
Copy Link Print
CardiologyNowNews.org CardiologyNowNews.org
Copyright - CardiologyNowNews
  • Contact Us
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?